Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6677 (AP)

SHAIK NANNE SAHEB v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/3641/2025 · 2025-02-12

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010063582025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3641/2025 Between: Shaik Nanne Saheb and another ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State of AP and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MAGANTI SAI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following order: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.3641 of 2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue a Writ or Writs, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in attempting to demolish the construction in Sy.No.584/3 of Cherukuru Village, Paruchuru Mandal, Bapatla District, while the matter is sub judice and pending disposal of the appeal dated 16.01.2025, preferred against the executive order dated 05.12.2024, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the principles of natural justice and Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioners' peaceful possession, until the disposal of the appeal and the pending writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. Basing on the order in W.P. (PIL) No.208 of 2023 dated 20.12.2023, the 6th respondent-Panchayat Secretary issued notice dated 07.11.2024, directing the petitioners herein to remove the encroachments voluntarily, failing which, the Panchayat will take action against the encroachers as per law. 3. Aggrieved by the said notice dated 07.11.2024, the petitioners herein filed W.P.No.29890 of 2024 before this Court and the same is sub-judice before this Court. Now the 6th respondent issued the present impugned notice dated 05.12.2024, directing the petitioners herein to hand over the extents of 366.60 square yards and 139.50 square yards along with constructions for the use of Gram Panchayat, indicating that an appeal is provided under Section 128 of the A.P.Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. 3 4. Accordingly, the petitioners herein filed an appeal before the 5th respondent-District Panchayat Officer. Now the said appeal is pending before the 5th respondent. 5. Learned Standing Counsel for the 6th respondent has admitted that an appeal is pending before the 5th respondent-District Panchayat Officer. 6. It is the apprehension of the writ petitioner that if the subject property of the appeal is demolished during pendency of the appeal, the appeal would render infructuous. 7. Hence, this Court, without delving into the merits of the case, is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction to the 5th respondent to dispose of the appeal, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the respondents are directed not to take any coercive steps against the subject properties. 8. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 12.02.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 3641 of 2025 Date : 12.02.2025 SPP