NAVEEN TRIPATHI AND 296 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/773/2023 · 2025-04-02
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6677 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6677 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:47455 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 773 of 2023 Petitioner :- Naveen Tripathi And 296 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Seemant Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Manu Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1. Sri Kushmondeya Shahi, learned Advocate, on basis of instructions, submits that the mandatory provision of registration under PRAN is subsequently withdrawn, therefore, the prayer of all the writ petitioner is substantially addressed.
2. In the aforesaid circumstance, since mandatory provision of registration under PRAN has already been withdrawn, therefore, the grievance of the petitioner is adequately addressed and nothing remains to decide the petition on merit.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Sri Shri Nath, Sri Shivendra Singh Badoria, Sri Umesh Chandra Kesarwani, Sri Sanjay Singh, Sri Kushmondeya Shahi, Sri Manvendra Singh, Sri Arun Kumar, Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh Kushwaha, Sri Bipin Bhai Pandey, Sri Yatinder, learned counsel for the respondents are present. Order Date :- 3.4.2025 Ruhi H. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.) Digitally signed by :- RUHI HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad