Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66747 (ALL)

ROHIT CHAURASIA v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/22899/2025 · 2025-07-02

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103426 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22899 of 2025 Applicant :- Rohit Chaurasia Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kamalesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Kamalesh Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the State and perused the material on record. 3. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant-Rohit Chaurasia, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No.123 of 2025, under Sections 376, 313 and 323 IPC, P.S. Kaptanganj, District Kushinagar. 4. The FIR of the matter was lodged on 28.3.2025 by the victim against the applicant alleging therein that on a false promise to marry since the last three years, he had been establishing physical relationship with her. Many times she became pregnant and the said pregnancy was aborted. When she again became pregnant, she asked him to marry but he refused and has assaulted her. A report be lodged and action be taken. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is argued that the victim is a major woman aged about 24 years as disclosed by her during investigation. It is further argued that relationship between the victim and the applicant was consensual relationship which was carried on since the last three years back. Previously there was no complaint whatsoever by her to any authorities. It is further argued that charge sheet has been submitted in the matter, para 13 of the affidavit in support of bail application has been placed before the Court. It has also been pointed out that the applicant is not having any criminal history as stated in para 22 of the affidavit. The applicant is in jail since 15.5.2025. 6. Per contra learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 7. After hearing the counsel for the parties and perusing the record, it is evident that the victim is a major woman aged about 24 years. There is allegation against the applicant that he on a false promise to marry since the last three years, establishing physical relationship with the victim but there was no complaint earlier. The relationship between the victim and the applicant was consensual relationship. Charge sheet has been submitted in the matter. 8. Looking to the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 9. Let the applicant-Rohit Chaurasia, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever. ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she/he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure her/him presence proclamation under section 84 BNSS, 2023 may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against her/him, in accordance with law, under section 209 BNS, 2023. (v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 351 BNSS, 2023. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against her/him in accordance with law and the trial court may proceed against her/him under Section 269 BNS, 2023. (vi) The trial court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial expeditiously after the release of the applicant. 10. The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. 11. The bail application is allowed. 12. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad