113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.5758 of 2025 Date of Decision: 02.06.2025 Gurpreet Singh …Petitioner Versus State of UT, Chandigarh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present:- Ms. Ekta Sharma, Advocate appearing for Mr. Hardeep Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (Oral) By way of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought the indulgence of this Court for the issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for seeking the release of his wife Ninder Kaur and minor son Prabhjot Singh, while averring that they have illegally been taken away and detained by respondents No.4 to 6. 2. Today, Mr. Shubham Mangla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, UT, Chandigarh (assisted by SI Baljinder Singh, Police Station Sarangpur) has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 in this case in pursuance of the copies of the present petition having been sent to the respondent-UT in advance and he, on the instructions from the above- named SI, informs the Court that Constable Parveen Kumar had been sent from Police Station Sarangpur, to the house of the parents of the alleged SEEMA SHARMA 2025.06.02 19:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRWP No.5758 of 2025 -2- detenue Ninder Kaur who had recorded her statement there. The copy of the afore-mentioned statement has been submitted in the Court (which has been placed on the file) and a perusal of the same reveals that the above- named alleged detenue has categorically stated therein that due to her maltreatment at the hands of the petitioner and his family members, she had come to her parental home out of her own sweet will and without any pressure and she has not been forcibly detained there by anyone. 3. In view of this statement, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on the instructions from the arguing counsel, seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-UT has no objection for the same. 5. Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn. 02.06.2025 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) seema JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable: No SEEMA SHARMA 2025.06.02 19:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment