Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66729 (CAL)

BINOY MAJUMDER v. THE DURGAPUR EX SERVICEMENS COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ORS

FMA/769/2025 · 2025-05-14

Debangsu Basak, Md Shabbar Rashidi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DL-6 27.01.2026 Court No.37 [Bench ID- 266046] (AD) CPAN 1285 of 2025 Binoy Majumder Vs. Mr. Abul Kalam Azad Islam, the Commissioner of Durgapur Municipal Corporation & Ors. in FMA 769 of 2025 Mr. Saheb Banerjee, Advocate (through VC) … for the petitioner Mr. Sandipan Banerjee, Advocate Ms. Pubasha Nandy Brahma, Advocate … for the alleged contemnors- Durgapur Municipal Corporation 1. Affidavit-in-opposition filed in Court be taken on record. 2. Time to file affidavit-in-reply is extended for a period of three weeks from date. 3. List the contempt petition four weeks hence. 4. In the meantime, the contemnors may remove such of the unauthorized construction as are occurring at the subject premises. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)