Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:112552 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19944 of 2025 Applicant :- Sameer Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J. 1-Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2-The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 73 of 2025, under Sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Civil Lines, District Muzaffar Nagar during the pendency of trial. 3-It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that according to the gang chart, the applicant is said to have been involved in three criminal cases, in which he has already been enlarged on bail, copy of bail order has been brought on record as Annexure Nos. 3, 4 and 5 to the bail application. It is next submitted that apart from gang-chart, applicant has a criminal history of three cases, out of which in two criminal cases, applicant has already been enlarged on bail, copies whereof have been annexed as Annexure Nos. 5 and 6. In one criminal case being case crime no. 122 of 2022, final report has been filed in favour of the applicant, copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure No. SA-1 to the supplementary affidavit dated 13.06.2025. It is further argued that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. The applicant is not a member of any gang. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future due to heavy dockets. The applicant is not a previous convict. The applicant is languishing in jail since 19.03.2025 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 4-Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the applicant is member of gang and habitual of committing crime. In case the applicant is released on bail, he will again indulge in similar anti-social activities and will misuse the bail by extending threat and intimidation to the prosecution witnesses. 5-Having considered the submissions of the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. 6-Let the applicant-Sameer involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 7-In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. 8-The trial Court shall make an endeavour to conclude the trial of the applicant expeditiously without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties in light of the provisions of Section 12 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. Order Date :- 14.7.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad