Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66705 (ALL)

NAWAB AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/19987/2025 · 2025-07-13

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111926 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19987 of 2025 Applicant :- Nawab Ahmad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Mishra,Rishabh Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ramesh Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.243 of 2025, under Sections-109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 352, 118(1), 351(3) of BNS, 2023, Police Station-Chandpur, District-Bijnor, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that as per the allegation in the FIR as well as the statement of injured, the allegation against the applicant is that applicant along with other co-accused persons has attacked the victim and the applicant has caused knife injuries to Masudul Hasan and Muzamil Ahmad. Though, as per the injury report of Masudul Hasan as well as injury of Muzamil Ahmad, the knife injuries are simple in nature. It is further submitted that the applicant has explained the criminal history of one case in the accompanying affidavit. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 11.05.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Nawab Ahmad involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 14.7.2025 S.Chaurasia Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad