SHANTA PRAMANIK v. BANGIYA GRAMIN VIKASH BANK AND ORS.
WPA/17532/2022 · 2025-04-22
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66702 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66702 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
16 1122..0033..22002266 Ct. No. 446 rrc
CPAN 1512 of 2025 (Shanta Pramanik Vs. Mr. Alok Kumar Goel & Ors.) in WPA 17532 of 2022
Mr. Sanjay Saha ….. For the petitioner
Mr. Baidurya Ghosal (V/C) ….. For the alleged contemnors
Mr. Saha, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, submits that although an intra-Court appeal has been preferred challenging the order, violation of which is the subject matter of the present contempt application, the alleged contemnors are not interested in pressing the appeal and are merely enjoying the stay of operation of the order while continuing to violate the same. Mr. Ghosal, learned advocate appearing for the alleged contemnors, disputes the contention of Mr. Saha and submits that the matter is pending in the list of the Hon’ble Division Bench, which has the determination to take up the appeal, and he expresses hope that the appeal shall be heard and decided shortly. In view thereof, the matter stands adjourned for a period of two weeks.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)