Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6670 (JHR)

SMT BASANTI DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WPC/999/2024 · 2025-08-08

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2025:JHHC:22607) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.999 of 2024 .... Smt. Basanti Devi, aged about 62 years, Wife of Sri Narayan Singh, resident of Taiser Bhandartoli, P.O. & P.S.-Kersai, District-Simdega .… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Deputy Commissioner, Sidmega having its office at Block-A, Collectorate Building, P.O. & P.S.-Simdega, District-Simdega 2. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Simdega having its office at Collectorate Building, P.O. & P.S.-Simdega, District-Simdega 3. The Circle Officer, Thethaitangar having its office at P.O. & P.S.-Thethaitangar, District-Simdega 4. Roshan Kerketta, Son of Ishidor Kerketta 5. William Dungdung, S/o-Late Suleman Dungdung 6. Joseph Kiro, S/o-Late Jowakim Kiro 7. Arun Kumar Baa, S/o-Hilaru Baa 8. Bhushan Dungdung, S/o-Anthony Dungdung 9. Francis Baa, S/o-Late Sukru Kharia 10. Walter Baa, S/o-Late Johan Kharia 11. Ajay Ekka, S/o-Ranjeet Ekka 12. Suman Ekka, S/o-Alfons Ekka 13. Hama Tete, W/o-Late Joseph Tete 14. James Bara, S/o-Matias Bara 15. Hilarus Oraon, S/o-Late Patras Oraon 16. Silvester Toppo, S/o-Late Joseph Oraon 17. Tinutus Dungdung, S/o-Late Leko Kharia 18. Samir Dipak Kerketta, S/o-Late Albis Oraon 19. Thomas Minz, S/o-Late Jawakim Minz 20. Walter Baa, S/o-Johan Baa 21. Ignesia Ekka, W/o-Late Remis Ekka 22. Sashi Bhusan Kerketta, S/o-Late Kamil Respondent Nos.4 to 22 are all resident of Village-Kongsera Besar, P.O. & P.S.- Thethaitanger, Thana No.96, District-Simdega .... Respondents .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Prakash Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. Anish Kr. Mishra, AC to Sr. SC-I For the Resp. Nos.4 to 8 & 10 to 22 : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Adv. : Mr. Adjitya Banerjee, Adv. .... 07/08.08.2025 1. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out her remedy in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the other side have no objection. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Shahid/ uploaded