Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2276] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 29/2010 Om Prakash S/o Jamuna Lal Tiwari, Bidyari, Presently R/o Subhash Chowk, Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur Raj. ----Appellant Versus
1. Sushil Kumar S/o Rajnarayan, Town Bayana, Teh. Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur Raj.
2. Sunil Kumar S/o Rajnarayan, Town Bayana, Teh. Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur Raj.
3. Sanjeev Kumar S/o Jagat Narayan, Town Bayana, Teh. Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur Raj.
4. Kashi Nath S/o Late Bhagwan Das, Town Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur Raj.
5. Smt. Narayani Devi Wd/o Late Bhagwan Das, Town Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur Raj.
6. Smt. Neelam D/o Late Bhagwan Das W/o Vijay Kumar Kalra, Jaipur Raj.
7. Smt. Padma D/o Late Bhagwan Das W/o Ashok Kumar 7, Faridabad Haryana
8. Smt. Pushpa D/o Bhagwan Das W/o Satish Chand Narang, Gandhi Chowk, Town Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur Raj. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma and Mr. Utkarsh Goyal for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajkumar Tongawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/01/2025
1. On dated 30.07.2024, the court has noticed that the counsel for the appellant has sought time for taking steps after death of
[2025:RJ-JP:2276] (2 of 2) [CSA-29/2010] respondent no.1-Sushil Kumar, respondent no.2-Sunil Kumar and respondent no.3-Sanjeev Kumar.
2. Nearly after six months not steps were taken by appellant so as to continue the instant civil second appeal.
3. All the three respondents-plaintiffs have expired and no application whatsoever has been filed to bring legal heirs of respondent nos.1, 2 and 3.
4. In view of aforesaid, the appeal can’t continue, therefore, the appeal stands abated, hence, same is dismissed in abatement on death of respondent nos.1, 2 and 3.
5. Misc. application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J Arun/102