SANDEEP AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/31357/2025 · 2025-07-01
Amarjot Bhatti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66683 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66683 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31357-2025 Date of decision:01.07.2025 SANDEEP AND OTHERS
....Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present: Mr. Shobhit Rapria, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Ambika Sood, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AMARJOT BHATTI
, J (Oral):
1.
Learned counsel for petitioners states that earlier petitioners No.5 and 6 had filed petition seeking quashing of FIR on merits and this fact was not disclosed to him by the petitioners, as a result this fact is not incorporated in the present petition. Therefore, he wants to withdraw present petition with liberty to file fresh by incorporating all the details.
2. In view of the statement, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
3. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands
disposed of accordingly.
(AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 01.07.2025 monika
1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No
2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.07.01 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document