SAHIL KHAN v. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
CWP/18593/2022 · 2025-05-05
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66682 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66682 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-18593
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(229)
Sahil Khan
Chandigarh Administration U.T. Chandigarh
CORAM:
Present:
KULDEEP TIWARI
1. the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a direction, to official respondents, to conduct a detailed carried out by respondent No.5 wrestling trials, for selecting the wrestling participants events, to be held at National/International level. Further, to constitute the Selection Committee participants for the events, Federation Cup (U20 and U15)
93-2022 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Versus Chandigarh Administration U.T. Chandigarh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Pradeep Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shubreet Kaur, Advocate for Mrs. Madhu Dayal, Addl. Standing Counsel for U.T. for respondents No.1 to 3 and 8. Mr. Rahul Bansal, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 6. Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Rajat Dogra, Advocate for respondent No.7. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a direction, to official respondents, to conduct a detailed carried out by respondent No.5-Wrestling Association, in conducting the wrestling trials, for selecting the wrestling participants , to be held at National/International level. Further, to constitute the election Committee, for all the trial conducted for selecting the wrestling participants for the events, Federation Cup (U20 and U15)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-18593-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision : 05.05.2025
…Petitioner
Chandigarh Administration U.T. Chandigarh and others ...Respondent KULDEEP TIWARI Ms. Shubreet Kaur, Advocate for Mrs. Madhu Dayal, Addl. Standing Counsel for U.T. for respondents No.1 to 3 and 8. Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a direction, to official respondents, to conduct a detailed enquiry into the process being Wrestling Association, in conducting the wrestling trials, for selecting the wrestling participants for various wrestling , to be held at National/International level. Further, to constitute the for all the trial conducted for selecting the wrestling participants for the events, Federation Cup (U20 and U15)-2022, held at
...Respondents Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a direction, to enquiry into the process being Wrestling Association, in conducting the for various wrestling , to be held at National/International level.
Further, to constitute the for all the trial conducted for selecting the wrestling 2022, held at MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.07 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-18593
Rohtak, from 24.08.2022 to 26.08.2 Roman Style National Wrestling Championship from 01.09.2022 to 04.09.2022, and 36 (Gujarat), from 23.09.2022 to 10.10.2022, for conducting fair and unb trials, to find out the meritorious persons.
2.
informs this Court, that most of prayers, as made in the instant writ petition, has been rendered infructuous. However, in order to era problems in the association, his complaint No.4 and 5, is required to be examined, so that in the future, the petitioner may not face the same problem. Association, is required to come up with a transparent procedure and that shall be put in a public domain, so as to eliminate all biasness.
3.
by the petitioner, to various authorities of U.T. Chand Wrestling Federation of India, is still pending that the petitioner is ready and willing to approach the No.4 and 5, by filing a fresh complaint/representation passed upon the respondents No.4 and 5, to decide
4.
opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents No.4 and 5, respectively, and they extend no objection, in case, a mandamus is passed upon them, to decide the complaint/representation, mo manner.
5.
a direction upon the respondents No.4 and 5, that in case, the petitioner, within
93-2022 (O&M) Rohtak, from 24.08.2022 to 26.08.2022, Under Roman Style National Wrestling Championship from 01.09.2022 to 04.09.2022, and 36th National Games, held at Gandhinagar , from 23.09.2022 to 10.10.2022, for conducting fair and unb trials, to find out the meritorious persons. Though learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, informs this Court, that most of prayers, as made in the instant writ petition, has been rendered infructuous. However, in order to era problems in the association, his complaint No.4 and 5, is required to be examined, so that in the future, the petitioner may not face the same problem. He further submits that the respondent tion, is required to come up with a transparent procedure and that shall be put in a public domain, so as to eliminate all biasness.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits by the petitioner, to various authorities of U.T. Chand Wrestling Federation of India, is still pending that the petitioner is ready and willing to approach the No.4 and 5, by filing a fresh complaint/representation passed upon the respondents No.4 and 5, to decide The prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents No.4 and 5, respectively, and they extend no objection, in case, a mandamus is passed upon them, to decide the complaint/representation, moved by the petitioner, in a time bound In view of the above, the instant writ petition is a direction upon the respondents No.4 and 5, that in case, the petitioner, within
2 022, Under-23 Senior Free Style, Greco Roman Style National Wrestling Championship-2022, held at Kochi, Kerala National Games, held at Gandhinagar , from 23.09.2022 to 10.10.2022, for conducting fair and unbiased Though learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, informs this Court, that most of prayers, as made in the instant writ petition, has been rendered infructuous. However, in order to eradicate the existing problems in the association, his complaint made before the respondent No.4 and 5, is required to be examined, so that in the future, the petitioner He further submits that the respondent tion, is required to come up with a transparent procedure and that shall be put in a public domain, so as to eliminate all biasness. petitioner submits that the complaint made by the petitioner, to various authorities of U.T. Chandigarh, as well as Wrestling Federation of India, is still pending. However, he further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to approach the respondents No.4 and 5, by filing a fresh complaint/representation, in case, a mandamus passed upon the respondents No.4 and 5, to decide his complaint.
The prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents No.4 and 5, respectively, and they extend no objection, in case, a mandamus is passed upon them, to ved by the petitioner, in a time bound In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of, with a direction upon the respondents No.4 and 5, that in case, the petitioner, within
23 Senior Free Style, Greco 2022, held at Kochi, Kerala National Games, held at Gandhinagar iased Though learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, informs this Court, that most of prayers, as made in the instant writ petition, dicate the existing made before the respondent No.4 and 5, is required to be examined, so that in the future, the petitioner He further submits that the respondent- tion, is required to come up with a transparent procedure and that shall that the complaint made igarh, as well as . However, he further submits respondents , in case, a mandamus is The prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents No.4 and 5, respectively, and they extend no objection, in case, a mandamus is passed upon them, to ved by the petitioner, in a time bound , with a direction upon the respondents No.4 and 5, that in case, the petitioner, within MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.07 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-18593
a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of cert a fresh complaint, the latter shall consider and make all endeavours to decide the same, within a period of 30 days, thereafter.
6.
7.
May 05, 2025 Manpreet
93-2022 (O&M) a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of cert a fresh complaint, the latter shall consider and make all endeavours to decide the same, within a period of 30 days, thereafter. Ordered accordingly. Pending applications, if any, stand
, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
3 a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, files a fresh complaint, the latter shall consider and make all endeavours to decide the same, within a period of 30 days, thereafter. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.
(KULDEEP TIWARI)
JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No
ified copy of this order, files a fresh complaint, the latter shall consider and make all endeavours to decide
MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.07 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment