IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 245 COCP-2337-2024 Date of decision : 19.09.2025 Sanjeev Kumar ...... Petitioner versus Shantanu Sharma, IAS and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Fateh Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paramjeet Singh, DAG, Haryana. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Counsel for the respondents at the outset submits that not only mutation stands cancelled, but the FIR with respect to forgery of the decree passed by the Court has also been registered. 2. Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. No further order is required to be passed in view of the stand taken by the respondents. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application seeking revival, in case any grievance still remains. 4. Disposed off, accordingly. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 19.09.2025 Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2025.09.23 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document