- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:6835 RP No. 200072 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REVIEW PETITION NO.200072 OF 2024 BETWEEN: UNION OF INDIA REPTD BY DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (PERSONNEL) CENTRAL RAILWAY SOLAPUR 500 006 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDHIRSINGH R VIJAPUR, ASG…. ABSENT) AND: 1. RATNABAI W/O LATE MALLESH JAGADALE AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS OCCUPATION HOUSEHOLD R.B.I.130/A, R/AT RAILWAY COLONY, WADI (IN), TQ CHITTAPUR DISTRICT KALABURAGI 585 102 2. SARITA D/O LATE MALLESH JAGADALE AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS OCCUPATION HOUSEHOLD R.B.I.130/A, RAILWAY COLONY, WADI (IN), TQ CHITTAPUR DISTRICT KALABURAGI 585 102 3. SANDHYARANI D/O LATE MALLESH HAGADALE AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS OCCUPATION STUDENT RESIDENT AT R.B.I. 130/A, RAILWAY COLONY Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:6835 RP No. 200072 of 2024 WADI (IN), TQ CHITTAPUR. DISTRICT KALABURAGI 58 5102 …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 47 RULE 1 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 18.11.2022 PASSED BY THIS COURT IN MFA NO.2000552/2015 ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) On perusal of the order sheet, it is seen that when the matter came up before the Court on 1.8.2025, there was no representation on behalf of petitioner and this Court finally granted two weeks' time to comply the objections raised by the Registry, failing which directed to post the matter for dismissal. 2. Inspite of the same, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner when the matter is called out at 2.36 p.m. today. 3. In the present petition, Registry has raised 27 objections. Despite granting sufficient time, learned counsel - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:6835 RP No. 200072 of 2024 for petitioner has not complied the objections raised by the Registry. 4. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE GSS List No.: 19 Sl No.: 1