GUGAN v. RANBIR SINGH XEN OP DIVISION DHBVNL MAHENDERGARH AND ANOTHER
COCP/2941/2025 · 2025-07-08
Vikas Suri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66656 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66656 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 102 COCP-2941-2025 Date of Decision: 08.07.2025 Gugan ...Petitioner Versus Ranbir Singh and another ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (ORAL)
1. This petition has been filed under Section 10 read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging non compliance and wilful disobedience of the order dated 30.09.2024 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mohindergarh, whereby the civil suit instituted by the petitioner was decreed and further direction was issued not to disconnect the electricity connection at the premises of the plaintiff.
2. At this stage, Mr. Sukhdeep Singh Parmar, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, on an advance copy of petition having been served and has filed his Power of Attorney, which is taken on record. He would state that on the same cause of action alleging contempt, the petitioner has filed an execution application and the same was registered as such. Upon perusal of the same by the Court of first instance, vide order dated 13.05.2025, copy of which has been produced in Court, the HARISH KUMAR 2025.07.09 12:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
COCP-2941-2025 -2- same has been converted into a miscellaneous application. He further submits that the said application would now be dealt with under the provisions of Order 39 Rule 2A CPC. It is further submitted that the petitioner has wilfully concealed the aforesaid fact while instituting the instant petition.
3. Faced with the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail his alternative remedy, in accordance with law.
4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
( VIKAS SURI ) July 08, 2025 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2025.07.09 12:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment