DAILY LOK ADALAT 503 Present: Corporation and even mobile number of the counsel for the appellant was not available in the bar directory, notice was issued to the said Corporation, which surprisingly was received back any report. the appellant Gehlawat, Advocate appeared on 27.03.2025 and sought adjournment to get instructions in the matter. On the adjourne counsel for the appellant Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate appeared as proxy date. The matter was adjourned to today when the proxy counsel undertook to ensure the presence of coun today. However, nobody has put in appearance even today in spite of a clear stipulation as contained in order dated 01.05.2025 that if nobody appears on behalf of the appellant consigned to record. Corporation has lost interest in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, consigned to record. Liberty is, however, reserved to the appellant Corporation to get the appeal revived by moving an appropriate application. parties. A copy of this order be also sent at the last known address of the appellant 02.05.2025 NainaRajput DAILY LOK ADALAT FAO-3327-2011 RAJASTHAN STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION V/S MALI SINGH & ORS. None for the appellant-Corporation. Mr. Karan Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. * * * * As nobody was appearing on behalf of the appellant Corporation and even mobile number of the counsel for the appellant was not available in the bar directory, notice was issued to the said Corporation, which surprisingly was received back any report. Thereafter, notice was issued to the Managing Director of the appellant-Corporation at its Jaipur address and thereafter, Mr. AK Gehlawat, Advocate appeared on 27.03.2025 and sought adjournment to get instructions in the matter. On the adjourne counsel for the appellant-Corporation did not appear and in his place, Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate appeared as proxy date. The matter was adjourned to today when the proxy counsel undertook to ensure the presence of coun today. However, nobody has put in appearance even today in spite of a clear stipulation as contained in order dated 01.05.2025 that if nobody appears on behalf of the appellant-Corporation, the file will be consigned to record. In the circumstances, it appears that the appellant Corporation has lost interest in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, consigned to record. Liberty is, however, reserved to the appellant Corporation to get the appeal revived by moving an appropriate plication. A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the parties. A copy of this order be also sent at the last known address of the appellant-Corporation. ( 02.05.2025 BENCH NO.3 RAJASTHAN STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION V/S MALI SINGH & ORS. Corporation. Mr. Karan Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. As nobody was appearing on behalf of the appellant- Corporation and even mobile number of the counsel for the appellant was not available in the bar directory, notice was issued to the said Corporation, which surprisingly was received back unserved without Thereafter, notice was issued to the Managing Director of Corporation at its Jaipur address and thereafter, Mr. AK Gehlawat, Advocate appeared on 27.03.2025 and sought adjournment to get instructions in the matter. On the adjourned date, learned Corporation did not appear and in his place, Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate appeared as proxy counsel and sought a date. The matter was adjourned to today when the proxy counsel undertook to ensure the presence of counsel for the appellant for today. However, nobody has put in appearance even today in spite of a clear stipulation as contained in order dated 01.05.2025 that if nobody Corporation, the file will be In the circumstances, it appears that the appellant- Corporation has lost interest in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, consigned to record. Liberty is, however, reserved to the appellant- Corporation to get the appeal revived by moving an appropriate A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the parties. A copy of this order be also sent at the last known address of (G.C. GARG) PRESIDENT (MAHAVIR SINGH CHAUHAN) MEMBER RAJASTHAN STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT - Corporation and even mobile number of the counsel for the appellant was not available in the bar directory, notice was issued to the said unserved without Thereafter, notice was issued to the Managing Director of Corporation at its Jaipur address and thereafter, Mr. AK Gehlawat, Advocate appeared on 27.03.2025 and sought adjournment d date, learned Corporation did not appear and in his place, counsel and sought a date. The matter was adjourned to today when the proxy counsel sel for the appellant for today. However, nobody has put in appearance even today in spite of a clear stipulation as contained in order dated 01.05.2025 that if nobody Corporation, the file will be - Corporation has lost interest in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, - Corporation to get the appeal revived by moving an appropriate A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the parties. A copy of this order be also sent at the last known address of ) PRESIDENT ) MEMBER NAINA KATHIAT 2025.05.06 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document