HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11969 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Compliance affidavit, filed by learned AGA for the State today in Court, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 3. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation qua accused-respondent no.5- Saddam has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been submitted against him. 4. Learned AGA for the State has further submitted that qua accused-respondent no.4- Chand Babu, investigation is also in progress and is likely to be concluded expeditiously. He has further submitted that as against the accused-respondent no.4 Chand Babu, an FIR under Section 209 of BNS has also been registered, which too is being investigated. 5. Learned AGA has further submitted that investigation in the instant case is proceeding in accordance with law and now, no cause of action survives in the present writ petition and as such, present writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, the same is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Madhukar Bharti, Pawan Kumar, Prince Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohammad Yakoob .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 7. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as having been infructuous. September 19, 2025 Nadim CRLP No. 11969 of 2025 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad