Dr. DEO PRAKASH PANDEY v. CHAUDHARY SARWAN KUMAR HP KRISHI VISHVAVIDYALAYA
CWP/2254/2025 · 2025-02-11
Ranjan Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6663 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6663 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 2254 of 2025 Decided on: 11.02.2025 __________________________________________________________
Dr. Deo Prakash Pandey ....Petitioner
Versus CSKHPKV & Ors. ….Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner : Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : None Ranjan Sharma, Judge After arguing for some time, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, so as to enable him to make an appropriate representation against the Impugned Office
Order dated 01.02.2025 [Annexure P-1] to the competent authority [Statement taken on record].
2. Taking into account the statement made by 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
Learned Counsel for petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so as to enable the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy before the competent authority.
3. In aforesaid terms, the instant petition and all pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge February 11, 2024 (Shamsh Tabrez) 2