IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.138 Vazeer Singh and State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. Mr.Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit No.2-Deputy Commissioner, 12.01.2025 (Anne 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the ca the writ petition is disposed of with a direction on the legal notice dated 12 petitioners, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 29.05.2025 Prince IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Singh and another Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Sandeep Siwach, Advocate, for the petitioner r.Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. * * * * * SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit Deputy Commissioner, Kaithal to take a decisi (Annexure P-2), submitted on behalf of Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the ca the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. legal notice dated 12.01.2025 (Annexure P , by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to , preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the nd if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16613-2025 Date of decision : 29.05.2025 .…. Petitioners ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI , Advocate, for the petitioners. submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent to take a decision on the legal notice dated on behalf of the petitioners. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, to respondent No.2 to take a decision (Annexure P-2), submitted on behalf of the , by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the nd if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No 5 Respondents submits that at this stage, he would h a direction to respondent dated Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection se, to take a decision the , by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the would be PRINCE SAINI 2025.07.01 21:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document