SREEYAPAN RAJA REDDY AND ANOTHER v. L.CHINNA VEERAMMA
SA/122/1992 · 2025-02-19
T Mallikarjuna Rao
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6662 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6662 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010064411992
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY-FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO:122/1992 Between: Sreeyapan Raja Reddy And Another ...APPELLANT AND L Chinna Veeramma ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. M V RAMANA REDDY
2. 528/K RAMESH NATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent:
1. L J VEERA REDDY The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellants/defendants under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 20.12.1991 passed in A.S.No.37 of 1989 on the file of learned I Additional District Court, Cuddapah, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 21.03.1989 passed in O.S.No.94 of 1986 on the file of learned IV Additional District Munsif, Cuddapah.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of either side. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M.
3. In the post lunch session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellants are not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal.
4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date:19.02.2025 MS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO.122 OF 1992 Date:19.02.2025
MS