Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66592 (PNJ)

SATPAL @ SATPAL SHARMA v. CHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE , IAS AND OTHERS

COCP/2890/2025 · 2025-09-09

Nidhi Gupta

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 207-I Satpal @ Satpal Sharma Chander Shehari Vikas Pradhikaran, HSVP Office Complex C Panchkula, Haryana and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated of this Court in CWP of Haryana and others” whereby the following direction COCP-2890-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2890 of 2025 Date of decision : Satpal @ Satpal Sharma Versus Chander Shekhar Khare, IAS, Chief Administrator, Haryana Shehari Vikas Pradhikaran, HSVP Office Complex C Panchkula, Haryana and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate (through VC) Mr. Rakesh Vohra, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Nihar Bala, Advocate with Mr. Aman Chavariya, Advocate for Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate for the respondents-HSVP. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 14.2.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by of this Court in CWP-20384-2021 titled as “ of Haryana and others” whereby the following direction “xxx xxx xxx Keeping in view of above detailed proposed plan and the interest of the land owners, a direction is being given in this case that all the executing courts in the State of Haryana are restrained from taking any coercive steps as t 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2890 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-09.09.2025 …..Petitioner Shekhar Khare, IAS, Chief Administrator, Haryana Shehari Vikas Pradhikaran, HSVP Office Complex C-3, Sector-6, …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Aditya Jain, Advocate (through VC) with Mr. Rakesh Vohra, Advocate Ms. Nihar Bala, Advocate with Mr. Aman Chavariya, Advocate for Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the interim 1) passed by the Division Bench titled as “Pradeep Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others” whereby the following direction was issued :- Keeping in view of above detailed proposed plan and the interest of the land owners, a direction is being given in this case that all the executing courts in the State of Haryana are restrained from taking any coercive steps as the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.10 20.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document No.3 by way of affidavit of Mrs. Anupma Malik, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate, Gurugram; and Status 08.09.2025 on behalf of respondent No.1 by way of affidavit of Shri Rakesh Saini, Estate Officer The same are taken on record. Copies thereof are supplied to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to tag the same at appropriate place in the file. R-1 annexed with their respective Status Reports and submit that the necessary compliance has been made; thus, no cause su present petition. COCP-2890-2025 (O & M) respondents have carved out plan for depositing the compensation amount and the reference courts will accept the compensation as per the above said proposed plan. Learned counsel for respondent further informs that due publication will be done with respect to proposed plan of depositing compensation in the entire State of Haryana so that land owners can be awared with respect to deposit of compensation as per the schedule stated above. A direction is being given to the respondents to comply and make the payment in accordance with the above said proposed plan/priority list. xxx xxx xxx” Status report dated 06.8.2025 on behalf of respondent No.3 by way of affidavit of Mrs. Anupma Malik, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate, Gurugram; and Status 08.09.2025 on behalf of respondent No.1 by way of affidavit of Shri Rakesh Saini, Estate Officer-I, HSVP, Gurugram have been filed. The same are taken on record. Copies thereof are supplied to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to tag the same at appropriate place in the file. Learned counsel for the respondents refers to Annexure 1 annexed with their respective Status Reports and submit that the necessary compliance has been made; thus, no cause su present petition. 2 respondents have carved out plan for depositing the compensation amount and the reference courts will accept the compensation as per the above said Learned counsel for respondent-HSVP further informs that due publication will be done h respect to proposed plan of depositing compensation in the entire State of Haryana so that land owners can be awared with respect to deposit of compensation as per the schedule stated A direction is being given to the respondents e the payment in accordance with the above said proposed plan/priority list. Status report dated 06.8.2025 on behalf of respondent No.3 by way of affidavit of Mrs. Anupma Malik, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate, Gurugram; and Status report dated 08.09.2025 on behalf of respondent No.1 by way of affidavit of Shri I, HSVP, Gurugram have been filed. The same are taken on record. Copies thereof are supplied to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The Registry is directed to tag the same at appropriate place in the file. Learned counsel for the respondents refers to Annexure 1 annexed with their respective Status Reports and submit that the necessary compliance has been made; thus, no cause survives in the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.10 20.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order dated 14.2.2022 (Annexure P may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition. withdrawn September 0 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2890-2025 (O & M) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order dated 14.2.2022 (Annexure P-1) has been complied with, he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition. Permitted to do so. The present contempt petition is withdrawn. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 09, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the 1) has been complied with, he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition. mpt petition is dismissed as Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.10 20.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document