Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6659 (RAJ)

NARAYAN MEENA AND ANOTHER v. LADU RAM AND OTHERS

CMA/1432/2015 · 2025-07-30

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:28994] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1432/2015 1. Narayan Meena S/o Shri Motiram Meena, aged about 70 years 2. Gopal Meena s/o Shri Motiram Meena, aged about 50 years Both are r/o Meenawala, near kanakpura, Railway Godown, Tehsil & District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Plaintiffs/Appellants Versus 1. Ladu Ram s/o Shri Dayaram Kumawat 2. Ramkaran s/o Shri Laduram Kumawat Both are r/o A-84, Kardhani Yojna Kalwar Road,Govindpura, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Surajpole Grah Nirmal Sahakari Samiti Through President Praveen Kumar, H.No.90, Near Taro ki Kut, Tonk Road, Jaipur ----Defendants/Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ranvijay Singh on behalf of Mr. Anil Mehta For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. L. Sharma on behalf of Mr. R. K. Daga HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 30/07/2025 The present appeal has been filed by the plaintiff/appellants under Order 43 Rule 1 of the CPC, assailing the impugned order dated 08.04.2015 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, No.18, Jaipur Metropolitan City, Jaipur in Civil Suit No.145/2011 titled as ‘Narayan Meena & Anr. Vs. Laduram & Ors.’, whereby the temporary injunction application has been dismissed. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the plaintiffs/appellants submits that the main suit No.25/2012, titled [2025:RJ-JP:28994] (2 of 2) [CMA-1432/2015] as ‘Narayan Meena & Anr. Vs. Laduram & Ors.’, has already been decided by the learned trial Court on 18.03.2019. Therefore, this appeal has been infructuous. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/37