Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6659 (JK)

ABDUL KHALIQ TANTRAY AND OTHERS v. STATE (For quashment of FIR 263/12 and for quashing of investigation u/s 403 RPC)

CRMC/93/2013 · 2025-04-05

Rahul Bharti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S. No. 11 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRMC No. 93/2013 IA No. 1/2023 [185/2013] Abdul Khaliq Tantray And Ors. ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs. State (for quashment of FIR 236/12 and for quashing of investigation u/s 403 RPC) ...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 05-04-2025 1. Nemo for the parties despite the case being called for the second time. 2. It seems that the reconstruction of the damaged record of CRMC No. 93/2013 is an impossibility and Law cannot insist for doing something which is impossible and, as such, CRMC No. 93/2013 shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution reserving the right for the interested parties to seek revival in case the record of the original case as well as CRMC No. 93/2013 is available in a reconstructed form. 3. Thus, this case is disposed of. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 05-04-2025 Shoaib