ABDUL KHALIQ TANTRAY AND OTHERS v. STATE (For quashment of FIR 263/12 and for quashing of investigation u/s 403 RPC)
CRMC/93/2013 · 2025-04-05
Rahul Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6659 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6659 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 11 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRMC No. 93/2013 IA No. 1/2023 [185/2013]
Abdul Khaliq Tantray And Ors. ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: None
Vs. State (for quashment of FIR 236/12 and for quashing of investigation u/s 403 RPC)
...Respondent(s) Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER 05-04-2025
1. Nemo for the parties despite the case being called for the second time.
2. It seems that the reconstruction of the damaged record of CRMC No. 93/2013 is an impossibility and Law cannot insist for doing something which is impossible and, as such, CRMC No. 93/2013 shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution reserving the right for the interested parties to seek revival in case the record of the original case as well as CRMC No. 93/2013 is available in a reconstructed form.
3. Thus, this case is disposed of.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 05-04-2025 Shoaib