Item- 8. sg 21-08-2025 Ct. 16 SAT 56 of 2024 CAN 1 of 2024 Pradip Kumar Karmakar Versus Arabinda Pramanick & Ors. Mr. Sounak Bhattacharya Mr. Sounak Mandal Mr. Anirban Saha Ray …for the respondents 1. The appellants are not represented. The respondents are represented through learned Advocate. 2. The department has filed a report wherefrom it appears that in spite of specific direction, defects have not been removed. 3. The appeal and the connected applications are, accordingly, dismissed for non-removal of the defects. (Soumen Sen, J.) (Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)