MANJUSHREE BANSAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/16373/2024 · 2025-08-11
Suvir Sehgal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66566 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66566 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (108)
CWP-16373-2024 Date of decision:- 11.08.2025 Manjushree Bansal and another
…Petitioners V/S State of Haryana and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Dr. Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate, with Mr. Rahul Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Deepak Vashishth, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
…
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
1. In view of the previous order passed by this Court, counsel for the petitioners states that the instant petition has become infructuous.
2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(SUVIR SEHGAL)
JUDGE 11.08.2025 Pardeep
Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.08.11 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment