IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.140 Charan Singh and others State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. Mr.Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit No.2-Deputy Commissioner, Sonipat 01.05.2025 (Anne 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction on the application dated 01.05.2025 petitioners, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 29.05.2025 Prince IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Charan Singh and others Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner r.Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit Deputy Commissioner, Sonipat to take a decisi (Annexure P-3), submitted on behalf of Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. application dated 01.05.2025 (Annexure P passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to , preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16617-2025 Date of decision : 29.05.2025 .…. Petitioners ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI , Advocate, for the petitioners. submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent to take a decision on the application dated on behalf of the petitioners. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, to respondent No.2 to take a decision (Annexure P-3), submitted on behalf of the passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No 5 Respondents submits that at this stage, he would h a direction to respondent dated Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, to take a decision the passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the would be PRINCE SAINI 2025.05.31 01:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document