Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66553 (CAL)

SAGNIK GHOSHAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/976/2025 · 2025-03-21

Jay Sengupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 7 April 21, 2026 Ct. 28 SG CRM(A) 976 of 2025 CRAN 1 of 2025 An application under Section 483(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for relaxation of the condition of anticipatory bail. And In the matter of: Sagnik Ghoshal … petitioner Mr. Prabir Mitra Ms. Sudarshana Srivastava … for the petitioner Mr. Akash Ganguly … for the State Report filed by the State is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a student of Jadavpur University. By an order dated 21.03.2025 in CRM(A) 976 of 2025, the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail, inter alia, on the condition to meet the investigating officer once in a month till conclusion of the investigation. Till now, the investigation has not yet been concluded. However, the petitioner has been regularly meeting the investigating officer, as directed. Heard learned counsel for the State. It appears that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the order passed by this Court, to meet the investigating officer once in a month. However, the investigation has not been concluded as yet. 2 Considering the above and in the interest of justice, I relax/waive the condition to meet the investigating officer once in a month till conclusion of investigation. However, rest of the conditions would remain the same. With these observations, the application for relaxation of the condition of anticipatory bail is disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)