Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:16754
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3588 of 2017 • Smt. Hemant Tandon W/o Sanjeev Tandon, Aged About 34 Years, Teacher Panchayat Deorikhurd Middle School, Block Belha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
3. The Principal, Government Middle School Deori Khurd, Block Belha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner
: Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, Advocate For State : Mr. Topi Lal Bareth, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
09.
04.2025
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief(s):-
“10.1 To call for the entire records pertaining to the petitioners’ case for the kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court. 10.2 To direct the respondent No. 2 to consider the petitioner’s promotion on the post of Lecturer Panchayat Science (Botany ). 10.3 Grant any other relief(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in favour of petitinoer, which may deem fit and proper in SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.04.09 17:53:18 +0530
2 the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Teacher (Panchayat) on 17.06.2005 and services of the petitioner were regularized on 29.04.2008. He would further submit that the petitioner submitted her representation on 18.06.2016 and 19.07.2017, claiming therein, promotion to the post of Lecturer (Panchayat), but till date the same has not been considered.
3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose.
4. Heard.
5. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider the claim of the petitioner in objective manner, preferably within a period of 90 days, if already not considered.
6. With the aforesaid observation(s), and direction(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge $iddhant