ARUN KUMAR ALIAS KAKA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/31295/2025 · 2025-07-01
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66545 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66545 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31295-2025 Date of Decision:01.07.2025 Arun Kumar @ Kaka
…Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and Anr.
…Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Vinod Pundir, Advocate for Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Deep Singh Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) Learned State counsel submits that Saroj, victim is not a party in the present case. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty aforesaid.
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 01.07.2025
JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.07.01 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh