Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66535 (BOM)

SUYOG BAHUUDESHIYA SHAIKSHANIK SAMAJIK, SEVABHAVI SANSTHA, GONDUR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/96/2014 · 2025-12-04

Shri Arun R Pedneker

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CP 96/14 & Ors. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 CONT. PETITION NO. 96 OF 2014 IN WP/2033/2013 SUYOG BAHUUDESHIYA SHAIKSHANIK SAMAJIK, SEVABHAVI SANSTHA, GONDUR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.K. Shirse ... 950 CONT. PETITION NO. 98 OF 2014 IN WP/2049/2013 SHIVSHAKTI PRATISHTHAN, MAHERGAON VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. D.R. Korade … 951 CONT. PETITION NO. 99 OF 2014 IN WP/2032/2013 SHIVSHAKTI PRATISHTHAN, MAHERGAON VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.K. Kotecha … 952 CONT. PETITION NO. 100 OF 2014 IN WP/885/2013 FULE-AMBEDKAR BAHUUDESHIYA SHAIKSHANIK AND VIKAS SANSTHA, SHIRPUR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.K. Shirse ... CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. CP 96/14 & Ors. 2 Dated : December 04, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to passage of time, the contempt petitions are rendered infructuous and nothing remained in the contempt petitions. 2. The contempt petitions are disposed off. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ssc/