IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No.71 of 2025 Decided on: 12th March, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fullan Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge This matter was taken up in the forenoon session, when looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner that she had not been paid salary for two months consequent upon her re-engagement in light of the decision in Satya Devi Versus State of H.P. and others2, learned Additional Advocate General was directed to have instructions in the matter. 2. Instructions were placed on record by the learned Additional Advocate General, in terms of which, admissible salary to the petitioner for two months has been 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 CWP No.2274 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 28.05.2024 2 released in her favour. This fact has been admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of above, the present execution petition to stand disposed of. The remaining benefits due to the petitioner under the aforesaid decision shall abide by the outcome of the Special Leave Petition filed by the respondents in the aforesaid decision in Satya Devi2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua March 12, 2025 Judge Mukesh