Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010018662025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./502/2025 SAMIRAN DAS S/O LATE HARINDRA DAS R/O VILL-GHOBALIPAM P.O.CHANDRAPUR, GUWAHATI-781150, DIST.KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM, VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. THROUGH THE PP, ASSAM 2:BIKASH DAS S/O LATE HARINDRA DAS R/O VILL-GHOBALIPAM P.O. CHANDRAPUR GUWAHATI-781150 DIST. KAMRUP (METRO) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A ATREYA, MS. C KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. M K BROWN, (AMICUS CURIAE, R2) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 09.06.2025 Page No.# 2/2 Heard Mr. A Atreya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Heard Ms. M.K Brown, learned Amicus Curiae appearing on behalf of respondent No. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023, whereby, the petitioner, Sri Samiran Das has prayed for releasing him on bail as he is facing trial in Special Case No. 278/2024 pending in the Court of the Ld. Special Judge, P.O.C.S.O, Kamrup(M), Guwahati. I have gone through the scanned copies of the Trial Court Record. Mr. A Atreya, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that because of land dispute involving 2(Two) brothers, this case has come into being. According to Mr. A Atreya, learned counsel for the petitioner, to some extent, the aforesaid fact has come up in the prosecution case also. I have considered the submission made by learned counsel of both the sides. This Court is of the opinion that under the given circumstances, the petitioner does not deserve to be released on bail. Therefore, the Bail Application of the petitioner Sri. Samiran Das is rejected and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant