Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6653 (AP)

BHUMARAJU VASUNDARA ALIAS RADHIKA v. SATHAVALLI BASKARMURTHY SARMA

CMA/650/2009 · 2025-02-19

Challa Gunaranjan, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010063162009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3509] WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 650/2009 Between: Bhumaraju Vasundara Alias Radhika ...APPELLANT AND Sathavalli Baskarmurthy Sarma ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI The Court made the following: RNT, J & CGR, J CMA No. 650 of 2009 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HON’BL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 650 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/wife, being aggrieved from the grant of divorce on the petition of the respondent/husband under Section 13 (1) (i) and (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in D.O.P.No.63 of 2004, by Order dated 04.08.2008, passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa. 2. The application for interim suspension of the decree of divorce filed by the appellant/wife was rejected by order dated 30.06.2009, observing that the respondent/husband has already got married and there was no justification to grant interim suspension of the decree of divorce. 3. No representation from either side. 4. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in consequence. _______________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ________________________ CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J Date: 19.02.2025 Dsr