IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Ishwar Singh and others State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Administrator, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pr decision on the petitioners. 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, withou the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Panchkula to take a decision on the made on behalf of the petitioner opportunity of hearing to all c receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the decision i at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. July 07, 2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.125 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18143- Date of Decision : Ishwar Singh and others …Petitioner Versus Haryana and others …Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Wazir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. *** SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the , Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (H.S.V.P.), Panchkula decision on the legal notice dated 16.08.2022 (Annexure P Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to to take a decision on the legal notice ade on behalf of the petitioners, by passing a sp opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within two receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Page 1 of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07.07.2025 …Petitioners …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Chief adhikaran (H.S.V.P.), Panchkula to take a (Annexure P-3), made on behalf of the Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection t commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Chief Administrator, HSVP, legal notice dated 16.08.2022 (Annexure P-3 , by passing a speaking order and after affording oncerned, preferably within two months from the date of Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the s not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE of 1 submits that at this stage, he would Chief to take a ), made on behalf of the Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection t commenting on the merits of the case, the Chief Administrator, HSVP, 3), eaking order and after affording from the date of Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the would be VANDANA 2025.07.09 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document