Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
..1.. 916-crwp-918-19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 918 OF 2019 SIDDHARTH SURESH BAGUL VERSUS SUSHIL MURLIDHAR BIYANI ...
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR J., DATE : 18.12.2025
PER COURT :
1. The petitioner challenging order dated 03.11.2019 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class No. 7, Aurangabad the application under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for recalling the complainant for further cross-examination, which came to be rejected.
2. The writ petition was filed in the year 2019. The impugned order dated 03.11.2019 is sought to be challenged in this petition wherein the said application for recalling the witness came to be rejected. Since the matter before the trial Court might have been disposed of, therefore, the writ petition would not survive. Even otherwise, the petitioner has not circulated this matter since last 6 years and was not listed before this Court any time before. When the matter is listed for the first time
..2.. 916-crwp-918-19
learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. This Court cannot come to aid of such litigants who are sleeping over their rights.
3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR ) JUDGE
shp/-