Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66491 (PNJ)

HIMANSHU AND ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/19675/2021 · 2025-03-18

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

278 1. HIMANSHU AND ORS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 2 SANDEEP KUMAR PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ORS. 3. NAVDEEP STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 4. PARAMJIT KUMAR PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND 5. RAMESH IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 18 CWP HIMANSHU AND ORS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CWP SANDEEP KUMAR VERSUS PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ORS. CWP VDEEP AND ORS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CWP PARAMJIT KUMAR AND ORS VERSUS PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND CWP RAMESH AND ORS VERSUS IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 18-03-2025 CWP-19675-2021 (O&M) ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondent(s) CWP-16343-2022 (O&M) ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ORS. ........Respondent(s) CWP-19046-2021 (O&M) ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondent(s) CWP-19162-2022 (O&M) ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ORS. ........Respondent(s) CWP-19440-2021 (O&M) ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS ........Petitioner(s) ........Respondent(s) ........Petitioner(s) ........Respondent(s) ........Petitioner(s) ........Respondent(s) ........Petitioner(s) ........Respondent(s) ........Petitioner(s) SAPNA GOYAL 2025.03.21 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-19675-2021 (O&M) and other connected cases. -2- THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH ........Respondent(s) 6. CWP-19655-2021 (O&M) SUMIT KUMAR KAIRON AND ORS ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHD. ........Respondent(s) 7. CWP-19661-2021 (O&M) HARI OM SHARMA AND ORS ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHD. ........Respondent(s) 8. CWP-19723-2021 (O&M) SANDEEP KAUSHIK AND ORS ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondent(s) 9. CWP-19735-2021 (O&M) SANDEEP YADAV ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondent(s) 10. CWP-19750-2021 (O&M) RAKESH KUMAR AND ORS ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT ........Respondent(s) SAPNA GOYAL 2025.03.21 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-19675-2021 (O&M) and other connected cases. -3- 11. CWP-19890-2021 (O&M) PARVEEN KUMARI AND ANR. ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondent(s) 12. CWP-19891-2021 (O&M) LIYAKAT ALI AND ORS ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ORS. ........Respondent(s) 13. CWP-2100-2024 (O&M) VIKASH YADAV AND ORS ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondent(s) 14. CWP-21079-2021 (O&M) SANJAY ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ORS ........Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Shubhkarman Singh Gill, Advocate for Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP No.19675 of 2021. Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate and Mr. Ojas Bansal, Advocate For the petitioners in CWP No.19723 and No.19046 of 2021. Mr. Shailender Mohan, Advocate and Mr. Tarun Kumar, Advocate For the petitioner in CWP No.19440 and No.21079 of 2021. Mr. Rahul Verma, Advocate SAPNA GOYAL 2025.03.21 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-19675-2021 (O&M) and other connected cases. -4- For the petitioner in CWP Nos.19655, 19661 and 19750 of 2021. Mr. Satyavir Singh, Advocate For the petitoienr in CWP No.19891 of 2021. Ms. Neha Rani, Advocate for Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate For the petitioner in CWP No.2100 of 2024. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG Haryana. Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate For respondent No.1-High Court. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. Present are the bunch of fourteen writ petitions of which details are mentioned in the heading, involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that by keeping the law point open, the present bunch of fourteen writ petitions may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further as the selection to the post in question has already taken place. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 5. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. 18-03-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.03.21 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document