Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010018912019 2025:GAU-AS:895 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/660/2019 RAJIB AGASTY AND 3 ORS. SON OF HEMANTA SARMA, RESIDENT OF VILL- BARI DATARA, P.O. BARI DATARA, P.S. NALBARI, DIST.- NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN- 781351. 2: BIBHUTI BHUSHAN BUJAR BARUA SON OF HERAMBA BUJAR BARUA R/O. VILL- DATARA P.O.- DAKSHINGAON P.S.- GHAGRAPARA DIST.- NALBARI ASSAM PIN- 781350 3: UTPAL KR. SARMA SON OF SRI SACHINDRA KR. SARMA R/O. VILLAGE- BARI DATARA P.O. BARI DATARA P.S. NALBARI DIST.- NALBARI ASSAM PIN- 781351. 4: CHANDAN BHAGAWATI SON OF SRI RAMANI MOHAN BHAGAWATI R/O. RAGHUNATH CHOUDHURY PATH P.O. AND P.S. HATIGAON DIST. KAMRUP(M) ASSAM PIN- 781038 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE DEPTT. OF LABOUR AND WELFARE, Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM SACHIBALAYA, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006. 2:MANAGEMENT OF M/S HINDUSTAN SAMACHAR ( A MULTI LINGUAL NATIONAL NEWS AGENCY) ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S DAS, MR. N BORUAH,MR K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. S AGARWAL (R2),MR H MAURYA (R2),MS. L SRIVASTAVA (R2) BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE O R D E R 28.01.2025 Heard Mr. S. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 and Mr. H. Maurya, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. The challenge made in this writ petition is to the judgment dated 11.12.2017 passed by the learned Labour Court in reference Case No.1/2017, whereby, the petitioners have been directed to be paid monetary compensation at the rate of 40,000/- to the petitioner no.1 and Rs. 30,000/- each to the remaining three petitioners. It is stated at the Bar that the parties have settled the issue by consent and agreed to enhance the compensation of further Rs. 10,000/- each petitioners already directed to be paid to the petitioners. In view of above, the learned counsels for the parties have prayed for Page No.# 3/3 disposal of the present petition on the above agreed terms between the petitioners and the respondent no.2. Having considered above, the writ petition stands disposed of on the above agreed terms by enhancing Rs. 10,000/- to each of the compensation directed to be paid to the petitioners. JUDGE Comparing Assistant