NAGESH NARSIMALU GANDEWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS
RA/194/2025 · 2025-11-26
Shri R M Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66475 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66475 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1-Aurangabad-WP-7399-24 WITH CONT. MT..doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7399 OF 2024 WITH REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO.194 OF 2025 IN CA/4190/2025 Nagesh Narsimalu Gandewar …. Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Thr. The Secretary and Ors. …. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10122 OF 2024 Vishwambhar Gopal Pawar …. Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Thr. The Secretary and Ors. …. Respondents ---- Mr. V. D. Salunke h/b. Mr. B. N. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.7399 of 2024. Mr.Kolsepatil, for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.10122 of
2024. Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 6-State. Mr. V. D. Hon, Senior Advocate along with Mr. A. V. Hon and Mr. S. S.Kote, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 and 7 to 11 ---- N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2
1-Aurangabad-WP-7399-24 WITH CONT. MT..doc CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 26th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C:- . For the reasons recorded separately, the Petitions stands allowed.
2. The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting Respondents seeks stay of this order for the period of six weeks.
3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner opposed the request.
4. In view of the fact that, the contesting Respondents are in possession of the premises in question, in order to give opportunity to them to take exception to the order passed by this Court before Hon’ble Supreme Court, the order stands stayed for the period of six weeks.
(R.M. JOSHI, J.) N.S. Kamble page 2 of 2