IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56092 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2025 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Mangru Ray @ Mangru Kumar Ray S/o Parma Ray R/o village- Raipur Bindgama, PS- Doriganj, District- Saran 2. Azad Kumar S/o Rajendra Ray R/o village- Raipur Bindgama, PS- Doriganj, District- Saran 3. Rajendra Ray S/o Late Ramashankar Ray @ Manulal Ray R/o village- Raipur Bindgama, PS- Doriganj, District- Saran 4. Parma Ray S/o Late Jagat Ray R/o village- Raipur Bindgama, PS- Doriganj, District- Saran 5. Yogendra Ray S/o Late Jagat Ray R/o village- Raipur Bindgama, PS- Doriganj, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar, APP Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 30-08-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case no.213 of 2025 registered under sections 109, 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 324(3), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, it is stated that while the informant had gone to take photograph of the dam (bandh), Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 56092 of 2025(2) dt.30-08-2025 2/3 the accused persons came there and started to abuse him. It is further stated that Yogendra Ray stated that he would have to give rangdari. Thereafter, he pointed a gun towards him while Rakesh Kumar is said to have assaulted with an iron rod. The accused persons are said to have assaulted with lathi, stick, butt of the gun etc. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. The allegation of assault is specific on Rakesh Kumar, who is not the petitioner herein. The injury has been found to be simple in nature. The petitioners undertake to cooperate in the investigation/trial. 5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the informant that there is specific allegation against petitioner no.5 of having threatened with a gun. Though the specific allegation is against Rakesh Kumar, however the allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioners herein are of having assaulted with lathi, stick, butt of the gun etc. However it is not in dispute that the injuries have been found to be simple in nature. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 56092 of 2025(2) dt.30-08-2025 3/3 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioners in the F.I.R., the specific allegation of assault being on Rakesh Kumar and the injuries having been found to be simple in nature, it is directed that all the five petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case no.213 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- VIII, Saran at Chapra. avinash/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T