THE KARNATAKA STATE CO OPERATIVE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/103330/2022 · 2025-09-19
S Sunil Dutt Yadav
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66442 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66442 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12711 WP No. 103330 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 103330 OF 2022 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE CONSUMER FEDERATION LTD., BRANCH OFFICE AT OPP. TO IDGA MAIDAN, ISR ROAD, HOSAPETE, R/BY ITS MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SHRI. MALLIKARJUN B. PUJAR, AGE. 55 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ C. BELLAKKI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-01, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BALLARY DISTRICT, BALLARI.
3.
THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BALLARI (TOWN), DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE, SHRI. SEVANIKETAN, DEVINAGAR, BALLARI-583103. TQ. AND DIST. BALLARY.
4.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE, SHRI. SEVANIKETAN, DEVINAGAR, BALLARI-583103, TQ. AND DIST. BALLARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED TENDER NOTIFICATION/ORDER DATED 21.07.2022 BEARING TENDER NO.ShiAaYo/Ba.Na/Koo.Mo.Te/2022-23 WRIT BALLARY(URBAN) ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT (PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE ‘A') & ETC.
Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12711 WP No. 103330 of 2022
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GOURP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
2. In light of the submission made, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
3. Needless to state that the rights of the petitioner to participate in future tender is not affected by dismissal of the present writ petition as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE
VGR, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 7