Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66438 (KAR)

MALLAPPA S/O HEMAPPA INDARAGI v. RAMAPPA S/O MAHADEVAPPA KANKARI

WP/107924/2025 · 2025-12-12

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18071 WP No. 107924 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEDGE WRIT PETITION NO. 107924 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MALLAPPA S/O. HEMAPPA INDARAGI, AGE. 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O. NO.11-9, WARD NO.1, OJANAHALLI-583 238, TQ AND DIST: KOPPAL. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. C.S. SHETTAR, ADVOCATE) AND: RAMAPPA S/O. MAHADEVAPPA KANKARI, AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. TIMMAPUR-582 115, TQ AND DIST. GADAG. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S.V. SHANBHAG, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER OF ISSUING WARRANT OF ARREST DATED 14.10.2025 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT AT KOPPAL IN EXECUTION CASE NO.104/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2025.12.16 11:21:23 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18071 WP No. 107924 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent jointly submit that the dispute between the parties is settled. 2. The present petition is arising from the execution proceeding in E.P.No.104/2024 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Koppal. 3. It is submitted that the execution proceeding is closed. It is submitted that the decreetal amount is paid by the petitioner/ judgment debtor to the respondent/decree holder. 4. The petitioner and respondent are before this Court. Parties jointly submit that they have entered into settlement. 5. Under these circumstances, accepting the terms of the settlement, the impugned order is substituted in terms of the settlement recorded by the parties. 6. Writ petition is allowed in terms of the settlement. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE CLK/CT-MCK