1 2025:CGHC:34417 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1265 of 2017 1 - Smt. Maheshwari Sahu W/o Shri Nageshwar Sahu, Aged About 25 Years Working As A Anganbadi Worker, Posted At, Mini Angan Badi Kendra Parsabhata, Gram Panchayat Chorbhathi, Police Station Sarsiwa, Revenue And Civil District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, New Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, Revenue And Civil District Raipur Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Office Of The Collector, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Tehsil, Revenue And Civil District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bilaigarh, Office Of The C E O, Janpad Panchayat Bilaigarh, Revenue And Civil District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 4 - District Programme Officer, Womens And Child Development Office, District Baloda Bazar, Tehsil, Revenue And Civil District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Sulochna Sahu, W/o Shyam Kumar, Working As Angan Badi Worker, Posted At Anganwadi Center, Chorbhatthi-2, Gram Panchayat Chorbhatthi, Police Station Sarsiwa, Revenue And Civil District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.07.21 14:14:08 +0530 2 6 - Shriram Sahu Sarpanch Of Gram Panchayat Chorbhathi, Police Station Sarsiwa, Revenue And Civil District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, P.L. For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Aman Kesharwani, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 21-07-2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this petition, order of termination of services has been passed against petitioner. At this stage, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the said order. 2) No objection from other side. 3) Consequently, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya