HIRLA GUMAN SINGH UCCHWARE v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY
Cr.M.P./581/2024 · 2025-03-26
Ambuj Nath, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6640 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6640 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M. P. (DB) No. 581 of 2024
-------
1. Hirla Guman Singh Ucchware, aged about 36 years,
2. Kumar Gurulal Uchware @ Kumar Singh, aged about 21 years, Both are sons of Guman Singh @ Guman Singh Bathu Ucchware, R/o Village Paachori, P.O. & P.S. Khakhar, District Burhanpur (Madhya Pradesh)
…... …. Petitioner(s)
Versus
Union of India through NIA
.…. …. Opp. Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
-------- For the Petitioner(s)
: Ms. Vidhika Saboo, Advocate For the UOI
: Mr. A. K. Das, Spl.P.P. (NIA)
--------
06/ Dated 26.03.2025
Heard Ms. Vidhika Saboo, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A.K.Das, learned Spl.P.P on behalf of the State. This application has been preferred by the petitioners for the modification of order dated 14.09.2023 passed in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 752 of 2022.
The modification, which has been sought for, is with respect to one of the conditions for grant of bail to the effect that one of the bailors should be a government servant.
It has been submitted that the petitioners are still in custody on account of non-fulfillment of the said condition and therefore, the modification has been sought for.
Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned Special P.P. on behalf of the N.I.A. has opposed the prayer for modification made by the petitioners while submitting that the Court should ensure the presence of the petitioners once they are released on bail.
-2-
On consideration of the aforesaid facts, we are inclined to modify the
order dated 14.09.2023 passed in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 752 of 2022 to the effect that instead of one of the bailors being a government servant, the same should be modified to the extent that one of the bailers should be a close relative of the petitioners. It is further indicated that petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the learned Trial Court till the conclusion of the trial.
The order dated 14.09.2023 passed in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 752 of 2022 is modified to the extent as mentioned herein above.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Ambuj Nath, J.) BS-Saurav/-