1 Serial No.07 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC[WP(C)]. No. 69 of 2025 in WP(C). No. 436 of 2024 Date of Decision: 28.04.2025 Shri. Bilgrak M. Marak. …Applicant -Versus- 1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by the Commissioner & Secretary/Public Health Engineering Department, Shillong. 2. The Deputy Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya Public Health Engineering Department, Shillong. 3. The Chief Engineer, P.H.E. Meghalaya, Shillong. 4. Shri. Patiencely Stone Lyngdoh, Sub Divisional Officer, PHE, Reservoir Sub Division, Mawphlang, East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya. 5. Smti. Shailin Dora Synrem, Sub Divisional Officer, PHE, Investigation Sub Division, Shillong, East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya. …Opposite Parties 2025:MLHC:327 2 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. A.S.Siddiqui, Sr. Adv. With Ms. A.Kharmyndai, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N.D.Chullai, AAG with Ms. Z.E.Nongkynrih, GA for R 1-3. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. This is an application for calling of the records of the selection process for the post of Sub Divisional Officer/ Assistant Engineer (Civil) which was advertised in the year 2004 and 2005. 2. Mr. A.S.Siddiqui, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Ms. A, Kharmyndai, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner submits that the records of the selection process is necessary, inasmuch as, initially the MPSC was requested to recommend 4(four) candidates against 4(four) vacancies, which was later revised to 13(thirteen) and at the time of the declaration of results, the number of vacancies available was 19(nineteen). 2025:MLHC:327 3 3. Mr. N.D.Chullai, learned AAG assisted by Ms. Z.E.Nongkynrih, learned GA for the respondents No. 1-3, in reply has refuted the prayer and submits that the records of the selection process being in the custody of the MPSC and they not being a party, this misc. application is incompetent. 4. This Court has given its due consideration to the application and though not granting the prayer made in the misc. case, however directs the respondents to produce the records of the appointment of all the 19(nineteen) incumbents at the time of hearing. 5. Misc. case stands closed and disposed of. Judge 2025:MLHC:327 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2025.04.29 05:47:02 IST