IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 147 SURJEET SINGH UNION OF INDIA CORAM: HON'BL Present: Mr. Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Ind for the respondents. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. The present writ petition has been filed seeking impugned Transfer Order/Movement Order dated 24.05.2025 vide which the petitioner was transferred from Faridkot to Kishanganj North Bengal as the case of the petitioner is fully covered by the offce Memorandum dated 11.03.2024. After argu submits that with regard to h representation dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure P taken any action satisfied at this stage, in case respondent No. Security Force, New Delhi IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH SURJEET SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ **** Mr. Ankur Malik, Advocate and Mr. Monu Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Indresh Goel, Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed seeking impugned Transfer Order/Movement Order dated 24.05.2025 vide which the petitioner was transferred from Faridkot to Kishanganj North Bengal as the case of the petitioner is fully covered by the offce Memorandum dated 11.03.2024. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to his grievance, the petitioner has representation dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure P taken any action thereupon till date. He contends satisfied at this stage, in case respondent No. Security Force, New Delhi is directed to consider and decide the IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16653-2025 Date of Decision: 29.05.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondents E MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ and resh Goel, Senior Panel Counsel The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned Transfer Order/Movement Order dated 24.05.2025 vide which the petitioner was transferred from Faridkot to Kishanganj North Bengal as the case of the petitioner is fully covered by the offce Memorandum dated 11.03.2024. ing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner grievance, the petitioner has submitted his representation dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure P-8) but the respondents have not He contends that the petitioner would be satisfied at this stage, in case respondent No.2-Director General, Border is directed to consider and decide the representation IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 2025 .05.2025 ... Petitioner .. Respondents quashing of the impugned Transfer Order/Movement Order dated 24.05.2025 vide which the petitioner was transferred from Faridkot to Kishanganj North Bengal as the case of the petitioner is fully covered by the offce Memorandum dated 11.03.2024. ing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted his not that the petitioner would be Director General, Border representation VISHAL SHARMA 2025.05.29 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16653- dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure P speaking order in a time bound manner. Notice of motion. Mr. Indresh Goel, Senior Panel Counsel the respondent response, if necessa request. Accordingly, the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, directing respondent No. 26.05.2025 (Annexure P period of two In the event be kept in abeyance for a period of MAY 29, 2025. Vishal Sharma -2025 26.05.2025 (Annexure P-8) submitted speaking order in a time bound manner. Notice of motion. Mr. Indresh Goel, Senior Panel Counsel respondents and prays for some time to complete instructions and file response, if necessary. He, however, does not have any Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, directing respondent No.2 to consider and de 26.05.2025 (Annexure P-8) by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a months of the receipt of certified copy of this order. In the event, the decision goes against the petitioner be kept in abeyance for a period of two weeks , 2025. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- submitted by the petitioner, by passing a Mr. Indresh Goel, Senior Panel Counsel accepts notice on behalf of for some time to complete instructions and file does not have any objection to the above the present petition is disposed of with the consent of the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, to consider and decide the representation dated by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a of the receipt of certified copy of this order. decision goes against the petitioner, the same shall two weeks from the date of order. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No by the petitioner, by passing a accepts notice on behalf of for some time to complete instructions and file above with the consent of the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, by representation dated by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a , the same shall VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) VISHAL SHARMA 2025.05.29 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document