2025:JHHC:13257 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.570 of 2025 ---- 1. Kiran Kumari, aged about 47 years, W/o Ram Kumar Raman, R/o Village-Kiandinagar, P.O.-Kolhaiya, P.S.-Rajpur, District-Chatra. 2. Manoj Parjapati, aged about 37 years, S/o Dhandev Prajapati, R/o Village – Rol, P.O.-Rol, P.S.-Chandwa, District-Latehar. …. …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The State of Jharkhand through Sri Uma Shankar Singh, Son of not known to the petitioners, the Secretary, Primary Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi having its office at Project Building, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi, Pin-834004. 3. Sri Sashi Prakash Singh, Son of not known to the petitioners, the Director, Primary Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi having its office at Project Building, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi, Pin-834004. 4. Sri Sandeep Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioners, the District Superintendent of Education, Palamau, P.O.+P.S.- Palamau, District- Palamau. 5. Sri Dinesh Mishra, Son of not known to the petitioners, the District Superintendent of Education, Chatra, P.O.+P.S.- Chatra, District-Chatra. 6. Sri Shashi Ranjan, Son of not known to the petitioners, the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, P.O.+P.S.- Palamau, District-Palamau. 7. Sri Ramesh Gholap, Son of not known to the petitioners, the Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, P.O.+P.S.- Chatra, District-Chatra. …. …. Opposite Party(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Awnish Shankar, Adv. For the Opposite Party(s) : Mrs. P. Tiwary, A.C. to A.G. ---- 02/Dated: 02nd May, 2025 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for initiating contempt proceedings against the opposite parties for non-compliance of the order dated 17.10.2024 passed in W.P.(S) No.5612 of 2024 passed by this Court. 2. Prima facie it appears that it is not a case of mutual transfer as the mutual transfer means an exchange of positions or locations between two 2025:JHHC:13257 Page | 2 Cont. Case (Civil) No.570 of 2025 individuals or groups or cadre. However, liberty has been given by the State Authorities by allowing the petitioners to file fresh applications. 3. In view of the above, this Court finds no reason to entertain the present contempt case. Accordingly, it is hereby dismissed. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/- Uploaded