Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134835 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 20550 of 2025 Applicant :- Sharad Goswami Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. Heard Sri Vivek Singh, learned counsel for the applicant/s and Sri J.B. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application U/S 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased direct the to allow this application and & to Case learned District Sessions Judge, Meerut to accept only two sureties for release the applicant on bail in 27 cases as Case Crime No.62 of 2022, U/s 411, 413, 414, 420, 467, 468, 120-B I.P.C., Case Crime No.303 of 2021, U/s 392, 413, 411, 34 I.P.C. Case Crime No.304 of 2021, U/s 420, 411, 413, 414, 34 I.P.C., Case Crime No.63 of 2022, U/s 63/72 Excise Act, Case Crime No.64 of 2022, U/s 3/25 Arms Act, Case crime No.77 of 2022, U/s 413, 34 I.P.C., Case Crime No.94 of 2022, U/s 2/3 U.P.Gangster Act at Police Station-Dehligate, District-Meerut, Case Crime No.229 of 2022, U/s 392, 411, 418, 413, 34 I.P.C., Case Crime No.227 of 2022, U/s 392, 411, 413, 120-B I.P.C., Crime No.230 of 2022, U/s 392, 411 I.P.C., Case Crime No.209 of 2022, U/s 392, 413, 120-B I.P.C. at Police Station-Lisarigate, District-Meerut, Case Crime No.152 of 2022, U/s 379, 413, 120-B I.P.C., Case Crime No.157 of 2022, U/s 379, 120, 413 I.P.C., Case Crime No.156 of 2022, U/s 379, 413, 120-B I.P.C., Case Crime No.83 of 2022, U/s 392, 411, 413, 120-B I.P.C. at P.s.-Civil Lines, District- Meerut, Case Crime No.107 of 2022, U/s 392 I.P.C., Case Crime No.120 of 2022, U/s 392, 504, 506 I.P.C., Case Crime No.122 of 2022, U/s 392 I.P.C., Case Crime No.291 of 2021, U/s 392, 504, 506 I.P.C., Case Crime No.292 of 2021, U/s 392, 504 I.P.C., Case Crime No.301 of 2021, U/s Section 392 I.P.C. at P.s.-Daurala, District-Meerut, Case Crime No.61 of 2022, U/s 392, 411, 413, 34, 120-B I.P.C. at P.S.-Lalkurti, District-Meerut, Crime No.177 of 2022, U/s 392 I.P.C. T.P.Nagar, District-Meerut, Case Crime No.132 of 2022, U/s 392, 411, 413, 120-B I.P.C. at P.s. at P.s. Nauchandi, District-Meerut, Case Crime No.258 of 2022, U/s 392 I.P.C. at P.s. Kankarkhera, District-Meerut, Case Crime No.120 of 2022, U/s 392, 413, 120B, 34 I.P.C. at P.s.-Pallavpuram, District- Meerut and Case Crime No.884 of 2019, U/s 411, 413, 414, 420, 467, 468, I.P.C. at P.s. Kankarkhera, District-Meerut in pursuance of bail orders granted by learned court concern and this Hon'ble Court (Annexure No.1). And/or pass such order or further orders which this Hon'ble court deem fit and proper as per the facts of the case. So the Justice be done otherwise the applicant shell suffered irreparable losses and injuries which cannot be compensated in any terms." 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is involved in 27 criminal cases of the same nature. Bail has been granted to him in all the cases by this Court or by trial court. It is argued that as bail has been granted in all the cases against the applicant, he is unable to file separate bail bonds and surety bonds, hence he may be permitted to file a personal bond and two sureties in one case which may be treated in all the said 27 cases. Learned counsel has relied upon the order passed by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. State of U.P.: S.L.P. (Crl) No. 8914-8915/2018 decided on 29.10.2018, the order dated 12.05.2021 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Application U/S 482/378/407 No.-1974 of 2021 (Shiv Shankar Gautam vs. State of U.P.), the order dated 28.06.2022 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. No.-15989 of 2022 (Sunil Chak vs. State of U.P. and another) and the order dated 18.07.2022 also passed by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in Application U/S 482 No. 19972 of 2022 (Jitendra Gupta @ Jeetu vs. State of U.P. and another) and has argued that in the said matters the situation was identical and the courts ordered filing a personal bond and two sureties in one case which was directed to be treated to be valid in all the other cases and was directed to be deemed to be an adequate compliance of all the other bail orders for release of the applicant. It is argued that as such appropriate directions to the said effect be passed. 4. Learned A.G.A. for the State could not dispute the said proposition and also orders as relied upon by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. After having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the records and the facts of the case and orders relied by learned counsel for the applicant, it is provided that the applicant shall be released in all the 27 cases which have been mentioned in paragraph 6 of the affidavit in support of application U/S 528 BNSS on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties to the like amount (one of the sureties to be a local person and other will be of family member of the applicant) which shall hold good for all the 27 cases. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the present application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad