HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 21331 of 2025 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. This application under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( hereinafter referred to as 'BNSS') has been filed seeking following prayer:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased:- (i) To quash the Impugned Non Bailable Warrant dated 23.04.2024, passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 10, Mathura, and Impugned proceedings under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. dated 29.01.2025, passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 10, Mathura in Case No. 1157 of 2022, (State Vs. Satish and others) arising out of case crime no. 0102 of 2022, under section 307, 323, 504 and 336 of I.P.C., Police Station- Jait, District Mathura. (ii) To stay the effect and operation of the Impugned Non Bailable Warrant dated 23.04.2024, passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 10, Mathura, and Impugned proceedings under section 82 of Cr.P.C. dated 29.01.2025, passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 10, Mathura in Case No. 1157 of 2022, (State Vs. Satish and others), arising out of case crime no. 0102 of 2022, under section 307, 323, 504 and 336 of I.P.C. Police Station-Jait, District- Mathura, during pendency of the present 528 application before this Hon'ble Court. (iii) To direct the learned court below to recall the impugned non bailable warrant and process under section 82 Cr.P.C., and be further pleased to direct the learned court below to decide the applicant's bail application, in view of law laid down in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. State of U.P. (Supra). (iii) And/or pass such other and further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury." 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the prayer made above is not being pressed and that applicant would appear before the trial Court concerned and a direction may be made to the trial Court concerned to decide his application for cancellation of warrants / application for bail expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2021 SCC Online SC 922 and protection may be granted till then. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Yash Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satish .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 4. In view of aforesaid, it is directed that in case applicant appears / surrenders before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and applies for cancellation of warrants or for bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the application under Section 528 BNSS is disposed of. September 1, 2025 'SP'/- NA528 No. 21331 of 2025 2 (Raj Beer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad