RAVINDRA ARJUN BAGUL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
CP/128/2016 · 2025-12-09
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66347 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66347 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
906 CONT. PETITION NO. 128 OF 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONT. PETITION NO. 128 OF 2016 IN WP/6720/2014 Ravindra Arjun Bagul VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others … • Adv. M. R. Wagh h/f. Mr. Paranjape Prakash S., Advocate for the Petitioner • Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for State … CORAM :
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 09.12.2025 P E R C O U R T :
1. By placing on record the letter dated 28.11.2020 addressed by the Uppar Tahsildar, Dhule City, learned AGP submits that the auction was conducted on 27.11.2025, but nobody came forward to purchase the property.
2. The record indicates that earlier also auctions were held in the year 2016 or prior thereto, but nobody came forward to purchase the property. Since the respondents have conducted the auctions, the order stands complied with. Hence, the contempt petition is disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:35309-DB