CWP-16250-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CWP-16250-2025 Date of Decision :29.05.2025 Border Linker Regd. Administrative Office Theri Sri Muktsar Sahib ...Petitioner Versus The State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.P.S. Chawla, Senior DAG, Punjab. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioner has a valid stage carriage permit on the route Batala to Madhipur but in the time table, timings have not been allotted to the petitioner, which is causing prejudice to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already raised the said grievance in the legal notice dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure P-6), which is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. AARTI SHARMA 2025.05.29 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16250-2025 -2- 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. T.P.S. Chawla, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that in case, legal notice dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure P-6) has been received by the respondents and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the respondents by passing an appropriate speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of copy of this order. In case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons for not accepting the claim of the petitioner will be mentioned in the speaking order so passed which order will be conveyed to the petitioner for its information and necessary action. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 6. Ordered accordingly. May 29, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.05.29 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document